• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Association for Academic Surgery (AAS)

Association for Academic Surgery (AAS)

Inspiring and Developing Young Academic Surgeons

  • About
    • AAS Staff
    • Contact Us
    • Foundation
  • Membership
    • Apply For Membership
    • New Member List
    • Membership Directory
  • Jobs
    • AAS Job Board
    • Post a Job
  • Educational Content
    • Blog
      • Submit a Post
    • Webinars
      • How to Write an Abstract
      • Succeeding in the General Surgery Residency Match: the International Medical Graduate Perspective
      • AAS Journal Club Webinars
      • Fireside Chat – Maintaining Balance & Control
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Equity Series
        • Allyship
        • PRIDE: The LGBTQ+ Community in Academic Surgery
        • Racial Discrimination in Academic Surgery
      • Academic Surgery in the Time of COVID-19 Series
        • How to Optimize your Research During the Pandemic
        • How to Optimize Educational Experiences During the Pandemic
        • Virtual Interviews
      • The Transition to Practice – Presented by Intuitive
    • Assistant Professor Playbook
  • Grants/Awards
    • AAS/AASF Research Awards
      • The Geoffrey Dunn MD Research Award in Surgical Palliative Care
      • AAS/AASF Henri Ford Junior Faculty Research Award
      • Joel J. Roslyn Faculty Research Award
      • AAS/AASF Trainee Research Fellowship Awards
    • Travel Awards
      • AAS/AASF Fall Courses Travel Award
      • AAS/AASF Student Diversity Travel Award
      • Senior Medical Student Travel Award
      • Visiting Professorships
    • Awards FAQ’s
  • Meetings
    • Academic Surgical Congress
    • AAS Fall Courses
    • Surgical Investigators’ Course
  • Leadership
    • Current AAS Leadership
    • AAS Past Presidents
    • How to Chair
    • Committee Missions & Objectives
    • AAS Officer Descriptions
  • Donate!
  • Login

Accepting, Receiving and Understanding Feedback

February 12, 2018 by Rebecca Rentea

Introduction about feedback

Giving feedback to others often comes easy, however knowing what to do with feedback from others is not as easy. Busy surgical residents often receive volumes of feedback in the operating room, outpatient settings, and regarding their general performance within the residency. Several authors have discussed the importance of timeliness (REF) and delivery dialogue to providing feedback in the surgical educational literature (REF). Yet, often feedback is informally distributed without clear metrics or dialogue to help contextualize it.  In “Thanks for the feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well” (REF Stone et al) the authors dissect how to succeed in a culture with constant feedback. They analyze the different types of feedback we receive and how to make sense of the content and delivery.

What is feedback?

Feedback is simply any information one receives about oneself, from experiences and other people.

What are types of feedback?

Feedback is far from uniform.  Its delivery can be formal or informal, direct or implicit, blunt or baroque.  The perception of feedback being delivered is obvious at times, whereas at other times it can be so subtly rendered as to be missed by the intended recipient. Feedback can be unfair or off base, it can be poorly timed, and is often poorly delivered.   There are at least three different kinds of feedback: appreciation (I am grateful for what you did…), coaching (When you hold the needle driver do it this way…), and evaluation (Among your colleagues, here’s where you stand…). The latter is the strongest form of feedback.  Evaluation aims to rate or rank against a set of standards, to align expectations and to inform decision making regarding promotions etc.

The role of the recipient in receiving Feedback

When feedback is delivered, it is often met with resistance or sometimes outright rejected. It doesn’t matter how much authority or power the benefactor of the feedback has; the receivers of the feedback are in control of what they do and do not let in, how they make sense of what they’re hearing, and whether they choose to make changes.

What to do with Feedback

The ability to receive and use feedback well is more of a skill than an inborn trait. Receiving feedback sits at the intersection of our drive to learn and our longing for acceptance. Receiving feedback well requires sorting and filtering—of learning how the other person sees things; of trying on ideas.

Why interpreting and using feedback can be challenging

Feedback is not well received when the giver and receiver interpret a given situation from differing perspectives.  The difficulty with accepting feedback is often since the feedback provided is first “interpreted” or “filter” based on the feedback providers own life experiences, values, and assumptions. In short, people don’t offer their raw observations as feedback and then build an interpretation together with the receiver to provide context. It is said that all advice is autobiographical and is observed through the lens they view their own life.

How to provide better feedback?

How can we give better feedback?  Ask yourself three questions: (1) What is my purpose in giving this feedback?  Do I want to help this individual grow and improve?  (2) Is the feedback clear and specific?  (3) Finally, pause and ask, “What’s could make this feedback more effective?”

How to use feedback better?

  1. Recognize the type of feedback you are getting. When seeking out feedback, ask for the specific kind you would like to receive (appreciation, coaching or evaluation).
  2. Press “pause” on your reaction and obtain specifics regarding context to help understand both the accuracy of the feedback or any oversights or misunderstandings?
  3. Ask the person providing feedback as well as yourself – “what is the next step?” To use feedback to your advantage, ask about what you’ve been doing that hasn’t been working and what you should do differently in the future.
  4. Do not blanket canvas your review of any one aspect of your residency to every aspect of what you do.
  5. Reddy ST, Zegarek MH, Fromme HB, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Feedback: A Qualitative Analysis of Data From Multispecialty Resident Focus Groups. Journal of graduate medical education 2015;7(2):214-219
  6. Lyle B, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Jarman BT. Do Attending Surgeons and Residents See Eye To Eye? An Evaluation of the Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education Milestones in General Surgery Residency. Journal of surgical education 2016;73(6):e54-e58
  7. Stone D, Heen S. Thanks for the feedback : the science and art of receiving feedback well (even when it is off base, unfair, poorly delivered, and frankly, you’re not in the mood). New York, New York: Viking; 2014:348 pages

 

 

 

 

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts

Rebecca Rentea

Rebecca M. Rentea, MD is a pediatric surgery colorectal fellow at Nationwide Children’s Hospital – Ohio State University. She completed her pediatric surgery fellowship at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri (where she will return as staff) and her surgery residency at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. She is interested in pediatric surgical clinical research as well as translational research involving necrotizing enterocolitis. She is a member of the Basic and Translational Science Committee.

Latest posts by Rebecca Rentea (see all)

  • Creating a unique research plan during surgery residency - May 4, 2018
  • Accepting, Receiving and Understanding Feedback - February 12, 2018

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Category: The Academic Surgeon

About Rebecca Rentea

Rebecca M. Rentea, MD is a pediatric surgery colorectal fellow at Nationwide Children’s Hospital – Ohio State University. She completed her pediatric surgery fellowship at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri (where she will return as staff) and her surgery residency at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. She is interested in pediatric surgical clinical research as well as translational research involving necrotizing enterocolitis. She is a member of the Basic and Translational Science Committee.

Previous Post:From female surgery resident to leader: the importance of emotional intelligence and feedback
Next Post:AAS Elects New Officers!
From female surgery resident to leader: the importance of emotional intelligence and feedback
AAS Elects New Officers!

Copyright © 2025 · Association for Academic Surgery (AAS) · All Rights Reserved