• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Association for Academic Surgery (AAS)

Association for Academic Surgery (AAS)

Inspiring and Developing Young Academic Surgeons

  • About
    • AAS Staff
    • Contact Us
    • Foundation
  • Membership
    • Apply For Membership
    • New Member List
    • Membership Directory
  • Jobs
    • AAS Job Board
    • Post a Job
  • Educational Content
    • Blog
      • Submit a Post
    • Webinars
      • How to Write an Abstract
      • Succeeding in the General Surgery Residency Match: the International Medical Graduate Perspective
      • AAS Journal Club Webinars
      • Fireside Chat – Maintaining Balance & Control
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Equity Series
        • Allyship
        • PRIDE: The LGBTQ+ Community in Academic Surgery
        • Racial Discrimination in Academic Surgery
      • Academic Surgery in the Time of COVID-19 Series
        • How to Optimize your Research During the Pandemic
        • How to Optimize Educational Experiences During the Pandemic
        • Virtual Interviews
      • The Transition to Practice – Presented by Intuitive
    • Assistant Professor Playbook
  • Grants/Awards
    • AAS/AASF Research Awards
      • The Geoffrey Dunn MD Research Award in Surgical Palliative Care
      • AAS/AASF Henri Ford Junior Faculty Research Award
      • Joel J. Roslyn Faculty Research Award
      • AAS/AASF Trainee Research Fellowship Awards
    • Travel Awards
      • AAS/AASF Fall Courses Travel Award
      • AAS/AASF Student Diversity Travel Award
      • Senior Medical Student Travel Award
      • Visiting Professorships
    • Awards FAQ’s
  • Meetings
    • Academic Surgical Congress
    • AAS Fall Courses
    • Surgical Investigators’ Course
  • Leadership
    • Current AAS Leadership
    • AAS Past Presidents
    • How to Chair
    • Committee Missions & Objectives
    • AAS Officer Descriptions
  • Donate!
  • Login

How do surgical trainees achieve autonomy while preserving patient safety? Issues with the current general surgery residency paradigm

December 12, 2016 by AAS Webmaster

We are in an era of conflicts in medicine. The goal of early discharges is in conflict with readmission rates. Resident quality of life is in conflict with academic productivity and clinical exposure. Perhaps the root conflict arising in surgical training is that between trainee autonomy and patient safety. The goal of surgical residency is to train high-quality general surgeons prepared to independently practice. Are the Halstedian principles practical in the current training environment with the emphasis on patient safety, duty hour restrictions, and increased emphasis on fellowship training? Ultra-subspecialization is replacing the ideal of general surgery that attracted many of us to the field, being able to perform a broad-range of procedures. Nearly a quarter of general surgery residents feel that their residency does not fully prepare them for practice; operative case numbers are down and cases are being spread out over more diverse procedures [1]. Being insecure in starting practice from residency and pressure to go into specialties leads to a large, competitive field of residents seeking fellowship training. Many academicians have completed significant professional development, performing research, earning advanced degrees, and training more than a decade prior to entering practice. This is occurring while we have shortages of general surgeons in medically underserved areas. The current system is not working. To help with decreased autonomy and experience, new “transition to practice” fellowships have been created for residents interested in pursuing general surgery.  Given that preparedness for practice is lacking following surgery residency, more of these fellowships or qualified mentorships could play a significant role, and new residency positions should be created to attract people to the practice of general surgery. Formal graduated autonomy is also needed so that patient safety can be maintained while allowing independent decision making by trainees. A separate academic pathway with shortened general surgery training and emphasis on early specialization and a general surgery pathway with graduated autonomy makes sense for trainees and the healthcare system.

References

  1. Hashimoto DA, Bynum WE, Lillemoe KD, et al. See more, do more, teach more: surgical resident autonomy and the transition to independent practice. Acad Med. 2016;91:757-60.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Category: The Academic Surgeon

About AAS Webmaster

The Association for Academic Surgery was founded in 1967 and has grown significantly over the years being widely recognized as an inclusive surgical organization with over 2,500 member surgeons.

Active members have traditionally held faculty appointments at a recognized academic center. Active membership is also available to senior/chief residents and fellows in approved training programs in general surgery and the surgical specialties. The impetus of the membership remains research-based academic surgery.

Previous Post:Request for Self-Nominations for JSR Associate Editor Positions
Next Post:How do we reward good doctors and teachers in academic surgery?
Request for Self-Nominations for JSR Associate Editor Positions
How do we reward good doctors and teachers in academic surgery?

Copyright © 2025 · Association for Academic Surgery (AAS) · All Rights Reserved